Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (1.00 seconds)

Hindustan Colas Ltd , Mum vs Assessee

above proposition. As regards, the number of workers, it was also pointed out that casual workers and contract workers were required to be taken into ... Works Private Limited (339 ITR 491). Taking into account the casual/contract workers, the assessee did fulfill the condition of requisite number of workers being
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Twilight Jewellery P. Ltd, Mumbai vs Assessee

Twilight Jewellery Pvt. Ltd that it is mainly engaged as contract manufacturer or job worker for its AE on whose behalf it has been manufacturing ... jewellery as per designs. The assessee is only a job worker or a contract manufacturer who is entitled for making charges based on its cost
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Sirdar C Carbonic Gas. Co. Ltd, ... vs Assessee

said expenditure was incurred, was in the nature of 'work contract' and hence was liable to TDS. Since the assessee had not deducted ... said expenditure was not relating to any work contract rather the payments were made to different workers through one representative. Though all the payments were
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Paper Products Ltd, Mumbai vs Department Of Income Tax

processes carried on for manufacturing garments for others under job work contracts. The activity of labour job involved use of machinery, labour, material which were ... expenses relating to the activity of manufacturing are borne by the job worker. The appellant is charging form the job worker
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next