Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 54 (0.71 seconds)

State vs . Anil Kumar Sehrawat Etc. on 23 May, 2011

Anil Kumar Sehrawat etc. from Currency Note Press confirmed that recovered currency notes of 500 denomination were counterfeit. On completion of investigation, charge sheet ... currency notes as to which one was counterfeit and genuine. He also stated that counterfeit currency notes Ex P13 were in resemblance to genuine currency
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Asgar Ahmad Etc on 28 November, 2011

Notes were checked. After seeing that IO felt that these are counterfeit notes. He prepared the list of notes. In the list, he mentioned ... number. The currency notes were serial wise and their numbers were from 9AW751351 to 9AW751370. The said currency notes were counterfeit and fake
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Allauddin And Ors. on 31 March, 2011

deliver the notes to Rashid Khan and they print the notes on their computers. The fake currency notes were sealed in two pullandas with ... Cash Department after examination opined the currency notes not genuine. The notes were again sent to Currency Note Press, Nasik which also gave the similar
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Mohd. Subhan & Ors. on 15 June, 2011

forged or counterfeit currency­note or bank­note, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be forged or counterfeit, shall be punished with ... notes which were sent to the Currency Note Press, Nasik is concerned, it has been established that those currency notes were fake Indian currency notes
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Sunil Kumar Etc. on 26 August, 2011

those counterfeit currency notes, one each of the two different numbers of the currency notes were got photocopied; then those currency notes ... currency notes of Rs 500/­ denomination and 401 notes of denomination of Rs 100/­ each examined by them were counterfeit. 48. Accused Mahinder Pal when
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . 1. Ram Parvesh, on 3 February, 2011

prove that (i) the note in question is a currency note or bank note; and (ii) the accused counterfeited it, or knowingly performed any part ... notes have different numbers and if they are having same number and notes are of same denomination, the notes must be counterfeit. He must
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Suresh And Ors. on 26 March, 2011

counterfeit, he showed it to a customer Naresh Kumar standing at his rehri who also found it a counterfeit note. Both of them took ... opined as counterfeit. The notes were also sent to Currency Note Press, Nasik where they were also opined to be counterfeit. Investigation revealed that aforesaid
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Sunil Garg @ Raj Kumar on 27 May, 2011

accused Sunil Garg @ Raj Kumar was found in possession of 100 counterfeit currency notes of the denomination of Rs.1000/-; 200 counterfeit currency notes ... accused got recovered from under the pillow and a key counterfeit note which were sealed with the seal of RM and seized vide memo
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next