petitioner was present at the scene of occurrence despite there being curfew.
It was implicit that he was part of the procession, which caused destruction
petitioner was present at the
scene of occurrence despite there being curfew and on the basis of
photographs attached with the reply, the identity
petitioner was present at the scene of occurrence despite there being curfew.
It was implicit that he was part of the procession, which caused destruction
separate incidents. He contends that on account of the Jat Agitation
curfew had been imposed in various districts of the State including Rohtak
and Jhajjar