made out in this petition is that there is a complete deadlock in the functioning of the company which would justify its winding ... solution could be found. According to Mr.Manmohan Singh, it resulted in deadlock and he terminated JVA on 31st October, 2003. Thereafter, these two petitions
Justice K.S.Puttaswamy(Retd) vs Union Of India on 26 September, 2018
Equivalent citations
authority had agreed to recommend the case of
the BPSL. There was deadlock for some period because of infight within
Bhushan family. However, this impasse
High Court. Fact remains
that there has been a complete deadlock, as far as affairs of the
Company are concerned. The project has not taken
Rajendra Singh & Ors. vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors. on 3 November
Dronfield, and Co., where matters
had come to a deadlock. But I would ask, is it
possible to suggest anything more dangerous to
the welfare ... even then there is no
reason why there should be a deadlock. The end
in view may still be attained by means to which
evidence
to support this finding.
e) Since 1971, there was deadlock in the
company and thus no possibility of revival, and
therefore, there
Group is pending in this court for determination and to avoid a
deadlock in the governance of the company in addition to be
directors
Dronfield, and Co., where matters had come to a deadlock. But I would ask, is it possible to suggest anything more dangerous to the welfare ... even then there is no reason why there should be a deadlock. The end in view may still be attained by means to which
only one methodology which can be adopted in breaking
this impasse or deadlock viz. to direct FOWC to secure the amount.
After all, this stalemate
