claimants for the documents was not favourably considered by the petitioner by taking a flimsy ground that the documents were destroyed during flood, an adverse
submission of the letter for fire accident is denied and no
such documents were submitted to the respondents nor it was marked as defence
evidence ... that the petitioner has studied in the said
school, but the documents were destroyed in fire accident and on enquiry in the
village some
Sadasivan, apart from the pleadings of parties, their conduct, documents filed, treatment of properties by them, blending if any, and other attendant circumstances have ... owned; (6) liberty of changing its form and even destroying it.
78. Admittedly, the document of title in respect of plot
Instead, the first defendant through the second defendant requested that the document be sent on collection basis through Bangkok Bank, PCL, London.
3.5. The plaintiff ... first defendant that the cargo was destroyed and destruction of the Cargo is proved through D9 series documents. It is pointed out that D9 series
evidence relating to documents may be given.Secondary evidence may be given of the existence, condition, or contents of a document in the following cases ... original is a public document within the meaning of section 74 ;
(f) when the original is a document of which a certified copy is permitted
pond or the nature of
property, on considering the evidence and documents available on
both sides but still dismissed the application stating that the
appointment ... effect
that all the documents in their offices were destroyed in the flood
during the year 1993.
10.In the judgment reported
manner destroy the case of the
prosecution.
19. The learned counsel for the accused would contend that all
the documents, including the statement of witnesses
manner destroy the case of the
prosecution.
19. The learned counsel for the accused would contend that all
the documents, including the statement of witnesses
regarding the
genuineness of this document. Though the learned Additional Public Prosecutor
would now contend that this document had been cooked up by the defence ... have completely destroyed the case of the
prosecution. The benefit arising out of these documents should naturally go
only in favour of the accused
been destroyed or lost. But, to admit the secondary evidence, it is not
sufficient to show merely that the original document is lost or taken
