document to substantiate this fact of ownership has been produced on
record. But it is contended that these documents have been tempered with
or destroyed ... secondary
evidence. Original title document is the primary evidence. If the original
document is lost or destroyed, the contents of the document should be
proved
accused. I came to know that
accused had destroyed all the documents on which he obtained the
signatures of my mother by giving threats ... statement favouring accused also for the reason as he
has destroyed all the documents on which he had obtained the signatures
of my mother
verbally
to him.
It is further deposed that the complainant has destroyed
documents in the custody of Central Bank of India, Panchshila Park ... State V Vikas Harjai 20 of 28
Delhi. These documents are namely her application written to the Bank to
withdraw her name from
documents pertaining to the
defendant were actually sent to the vendor for custody, so it is not
established that the original documents were destroyed ... original document or oral accounts of the contents of the
document given by a person who has himself seen the document. The
Suit
agreement bond. It is submitted by the plaintiff that the original
documents were destroyed in book worm infection. To prove the
same, plaintiff has filed ... signatures or stamp, it cannot be
believed that the original documents were destroyed by book
worm infection and therefore the plaintiff cannot be allowed
denial, defendant no.1 denied it for want of the original document.
However, the agreement and its terms and conditions were not denied
in written ... required to
be enforced and that the document was subsequently destroyed.
Counter Claim of defendant no.1.
In the written statement defendant filed counter claim
documents are not within the control of the complainant, such as,
Doctors' note, Nurses' note, consent forms and similar documents.
These documents ... submission of Learned counsel for the
revisionist that hospital authorities may destroy the documents is
unfounded and without any basis. The Learned ACMM has taken
respondent is that such documents
are already lost. Further in his cross examination he further
deposed that such documents were destroyed in fire ... witness RW-2 admitted in his cross
examination that no document relating to complaint to police
department regarding loss of such document is placed
seized in DD no. 20A dt. 01.01.2007,
PS, Lajpat Nagar. No documents regarding ownership of the vehicle was
found inside the car and the rojnamcha ... further deposed that the record pertaining to the old documents
were destroyed vide order Ex PW9/A ( for the sake of convenient the same
terms of friendly loan.
Defendants assured that they would destroy the said loan
documents and return the possession slip of suit property to the
plaintiff ... refused to return the property papers and to
destroy the loan documents. Plaintiff became surprised by
seeing the attitude of defendant no.1 while this
