decree dated March 17, 1978 passed
in Ejectment Suit No. 1442 of 1974 and the Ejectment Execution
Case No. 125 of 2000.
It was next ... showed that, an eviction proceeding was initiated
which was numbered as Ejectment Execution Case No. 125 of
2000. The eviction proceeding was initiated
said appeal, the appellant files an application for stay
of the Ejectment Execution Case No.20 of 2012.
Mr. Ganguly, learned senior advocate appearing ... appellant
submits that the learned court below is proceeding with the
Ejectment Execution Case though the second appeal has been
admitted and he accordingly, prays
Tehsildar, Delhi,
for execution."
(ii) Admittedly, the Revenue Authorities did not take any steps for
execution of the ejectment order dated 30.04.1982. Instead ... Shahdara. In these execution proceedings, the
defendant took a stand that the period of limitation to file execution
proceedings against ejectment order dated
Tehsildar, Delhi, for execution."
(ii) Admittedly, the Revenue Authorities did not take any steps for execution of the
ejectment order dated 30.04.1982. Instead ... Shahdara. In these execution proceedings, the defendants took a
stand that the period of limitation to file execution proceedings against
ejectment order dated
Tehsildar, Delhi, for execution."
(ii) Admittedly, the Revenue Authorities did not take any steps for execution of the
ejectment order dated 30.04.1982. Instead ... Shahdara. In these execution proceedings, the defendants took a
stand that the period of limitation to file execution proceedings against
ejectment order dated
Tehsildar, Delhi, for execution."
(ii) Admittedly, the Revenue Authorities did not take any steps for execution of the
ejectment order dated 30.04.1982. Instead ... Shahdara. In these execution proceedings, the defendants took a
stand that the period of limitation to file execution proceedings against
ejectment order dated
Tehsildar, Delhi, for execution."
(ii) Admittedly, the Revenue Authorities did not take any steps for execution of the
ejectment order dated 30.04.1982. Instead ... Shahdara. In these execution proceedings, the defendants took a
stand that the period of limitation to file execution proceedings against
ejectment order dated
Tehsildar, Delhi, for execution."
(ii) Admittedly, the Revenue Authorities did not take any steps for execution of the
ejectment order dated 30.04.1982. Instead ... Shahdara. In these execution proceedings, the defendants took a
stand that the period of limitation to file execution proceedings against
ejectment order dated
Tehsildar, Delhi, for execution."
(ii) Admittedly, the Revenue Authorities did not take any steps for execution of the
ejectment order dated 30.04.1982. Instead ... Shahdara. In these execution proceedings, the defendants took a
stand that the period of limitation to file execution proceedings against
ejectment order dated
Tehsildar, Delhi, for execution."
(ii) Admittedly, the Revenue Authorities did not take any steps for execution of the
ejectment order dated 30.04.1982. Instead ... Shahdara. In these execution proceedings, the defendants took a
stand that the period of limitation to file execution proceedings against
ejectment order dated
