Judge rightly observed that having received the notice in the execution
proceedings, the petitioners deliberately caused the delay and filed this
petition after two years ... petitioners is
to delay the execution of the decree got by the respondent/plaintiff in the
suit for ejectment, I do not find any reason
Judge rightly observed that having received the notice in the execution
proceedings, the petitioners deliberately caused the delay and filed this
petition after two years ... petitioners is
to delay the execution of the decree got by the respondent/plaintiff in the
suit for ejectment, I do not find any reason
Judge rightly observed that having received the notice in the execution
proceedings, the petitioners deliberately caused the delay and filed this
petition after two years ... petitioners is
to delay the execution of the decree got by the respondent/plaintiff in the
suit for ejectment, I do not find any reason
filed an
execution petition in E.P.No.27 of 2015 for delivery of vacant possession of the
suit premises. Pending the execution petition ... Civil Court
has no jurisdiction to entertain the suits for ejectment.
8. It is seen that the suit property is situated in the Thiruverkadu Village
petitioner is the defendant in the suit filed by the
respondents for ejectment in respect of the suit schedule property.
According to the respondents, they ... virtue of
G.O.Ms.No.2000 dated 16.08.1976. After execution of notice, the
respondents filed a suit.
3. The petitioner filed a written statement
landlords had obtained an effective decree and had
succeeded in ejecting the tenants as a result of that
decree, which may have become final between ... parties, that decree may not have been re-opened and
the execution taken thereunder may not have been
recalled. But it was during the pendency
findings of pending suit is prevail over the execution order.
Thereafter, the execution E.P was terminated on 21.11.2016 against the
termination ... ejectment in the year 1990 in O.S No. 16 of 1999 against the original
owner Mohan and the said Mohan contested the ejectment suit
initiated ejectment proceeding in O.S.No.
629 of 2012 before the District Munsif Court, Madurai Town. The said
suit was decreed and execution proceeding
maintainable before the Rent Controller.
Thereafter, the 3rd respondent has filed an ejectment suit in O.S. No.1527 of
2020 on the file ... statutory tenant, he is
entitled to get electricity service connection on execution of indemnity bond,
under Clause 27(4) of Tamil Nadu Electricity Distribution Code
petitioner submits that
the petitioner/landlord filed a suit for ejectment against the respondent
in O.S.No.237 of 2003 and the same ... After the dismissal of the second appeal, the
petitioner/landlord filed an Execution Petition
