seek further orders from
learned Appellate Authority on 14.10.2014, the execution of ejectment
order be stayed.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
However, as per the undertaking given
been dismissed by this Court and the appeal against the
order of ejectment dated 3.12.2013 has been dismissed by the Additional
District Judge (Appellate Authority ... property, arising between the parties, during the execution
proceedings. However, in this case, after the passing of ejectment order
against the petitioner, no question
motion for
18.12.2014.
Dasti as well.
Till then, the execution of the ejectment order passed
by the Rent Controller, if not already executed, shall
remain
petitioner, in brief, is that in the execution application
No.92 dated 1.12.2012, ejectment order of respondent No.2 was passed and
respondent
counsel for the respondent
argues that the appellant has not admitted the execution of this agreement
and the Court below have also not relied upon ... Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949
and the landlord can always seek the ejectment of the tenant on the
grounds available to him under the above
ejected from the demised premises on the ground of personal bona fide
necessity of the landlord. The Appellate Authority has stayed the
execution but directed
Rent Controller is not binding on them. The
Executing Court dismissed the execution petition with the observation
that the rent note was executed by Jagjit ... Court by the objectors, who
have been putting the order of ejectment passed against Jagjit Singh on
hold for the last more than 13 years
premises vide agreement Ex.RW1/C. In order to prove the
execution of agreement, permission of Court was sought to examine
DEEPAK KUMAR ... give specimen signature is merely an attempt
to delay proceeding in ejectment proceedings which is pending for last more
than ten years.
The revision-petitioner
short and
invalid?OPA
2. Whether respondent is liable to be ejected for change of
user of the demised premises?OPA
3. Whether petitioner requires ... Madan Lal and another witness AW Kuldip Singh proved the
factum of execution of Will by Madan Lal in favour of his four sons
with the execution
and delivery of possession of the premises in
execution titled as Bhagwant Kaur versus Ramesh
Kumar and others from the Court ... simply to mislead the Hon'ble Court. The perusal
of the ejectment order shows that the ejectment
order was made with respect
