nothing inherently wrong in an employer
treating certain posts as equal posts or equal status posts,
provided that in doing so he exercises his discretion ... Rules providing for the said posts being posts being
treated as equated posts or equal status posts can be
negatived on the ground of delay
therefore,
nothing inherently wrong in an employer treating certain
posts as equated posts or equal status posts provided
that, in doing so, he exercises ... equality enshrined
in Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. It is also clear
that for treating certain posts as equated posts or equal
status
Rules, 1971, the posts of Private Secretary are being regarded as equal status posts with those of Superintendent and Court Master. There is a joint ... also recommended for the other equal status posts for the reason that the said posts were equal status posts.
(5) The Government, however, revised
Ramesh Rangashamaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 25 April, 2013
Equivalent citations: 2014 LAB
solely on the ground that according to the Rules these were equal status posts. It was accordingly decided that the Superintendents should not be treated ... status posts in all fairness they should get the same scale of pay specially when all the three categories of posts are feeder posts
therefore, nothing inherently wrong in
an employer treating certain posts as equated posts or equal
status posts provided that, in doing so, he exercises ... equality enshrined in Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. It
is also clear that for treating certain posts as equated posts or
equal status
therefore, nothing inherently wrong in an employer treating certain posts as
equated posts or equal status posts provided that, in doing so, he exercises ... equality
enshrined in Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. it is also clear that for
treating certain posts as equated posts or equal status
with joint inter-se seniority of
confirmed employees in categories of equal status posts. There was a
joint seniority list for three categories of employees ... same.
The Court held that for treating the certain posts as equated posts or equal
status posts, even the sources of recruitment need
Joint inter se seniority of confirmed employees in
categories of equal status posts shall be determined according
to their dates of confirmation ... same date in categories of equal status their joint inter se
seniority in categories of equal status posts shall remain the
same
therefore, nothing inherently wrong in an employer treating certain posts as equated posts or equal status posts provided that, in doing so, he exercises ... equality enshrined in Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution. It is also clear that for treating certain posts as equated posts or equal status
