March, 2007 to the appellant demanding differential duty on the excess freight collected by them from their dealers over and above the actual cost ... Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000 by excluding the excess freight from transaction value while determining the assessable value of the goods
Railway
Act, 1989 to the Appellant-Union for refund of excess freight charges
with respect to a consignment dated 25.08.2022, due to change in
methodology ... their letter that they had committed a mistake
in charging excess freight on wrong calculation of distance.
The limitation started running from the date
appellant railways settled the claim of respondent
Company in respect of excess freight charges which
were within the limitation period and the remaining ... excess charges were not paid on the reason that they
are barred by limitation. Being aggrieved by the
repudiation of claim for remaining excess freight
Claims Tribunal, Chennai Bench, granting the relief of refund of the excess freight paid by the respondent-applicant with interest at 12% per annum from ... excessive. It is reasonable to award interest at 12% per annum. ... So, the applicant is entitled to the refund of excess freight of .... together with
noticed that the appellant was
not including the amount of excess freight collected from the dealers
in the assessable value though this amount was collected ... freight over and above the freight actually
incurred for transportation during the period of dispute and they were
not including the excess freight collected from
noticed that the appellant was
not including the amount of excess freight collected from the dealers
in the assessable value though this amount was collected ... freight over and above the freight actually
incurred for transportation during the period of dispute and they were
not including the excess freight collected from
appellant
immediately prefers a claim with
the collieries for the excess
freight paid in respect of coal
actually not supplied and realised
the same ... sale of coal amount to several
crores of rupees and the excess
freight charges by the railways for
the coal actually not supplied
Vishnupuram (the forwarding/booking station under South Central Railway) and
collected excess freight of Rs. 1,32,353/- on 18.11.2006 without proper
jurisdiction. Additionally ... claim that the
Railway authority/appellant had wrongfully charged excess freight due to an
incorrect distance of 2478 KM and a wrong tariff rate
Railways Act, 1989 and
prayed to refund of excess freight paid. The respondents most illegally rejected
the case of the appellant by recording reasons that ... respondents could not have rejected the claim of refund of
excess freight charged on the ground of a time-barred claim. The aforesaid
policy
Railways Act, 1989 and
prayed to refund of excess freight paid. The respondents most illegally rejected
the case of the appellant by recording reasons that ... respondents could not have rejected the claim of refund of
excess freight charged on the ground of a time-barred claim. The aforesaid
policy
