Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1107 (2.94 seconds)

Sridhar vs State Rep. By on 31 October, 2013

submitted that for the offence of cheating, there should be a false representation or fraudulent/dishonest inducement to deliver the property or intentional inducement ... case for the offence of cheating. There is no false representation of fraudulent/dishonest inducement by the petitioner to the defacto-complainant to make
Madras High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - R Subbiah - Full Document

Ganesan vs State Rep By on 28 October, 2022

that it was a water body. They did not make any false representation to the defacto complainant. 4.Mr.S.Balaji, learned Government Advocate submitted ... done, it cannot be ascertained as to whether the petitioners made false representation or they were also under the impression that the property was marketable
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next