Search Results Page

Search Results

21 - 30 of 831 (1.20 seconds)

Smt. Urmila vs Bank Of India on 2 August, 2022

petitioners has argued that when the appeal filed before the DRAT was not entertained for want of deposit of 50% of the total outstanding debt ... counsel for the petitioner is that the DRAT has wrongly entertained the appeal without fulfilling the fee condition of depositing 50% of the total debt
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - V Rusia - Full Document
Previous   1 2 3   4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next