filing A.I.R.No.40 of
2014 before the DRAT, a Court fee of a sum of Rs.20,505/- was paid ... Legal Services Authority
for refund of the court fee, as the DRAT has no power / provision for
such refund.
7. In this context
Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (for
short "DRAT") by which the DRAT had directed the Recovery
1/26
::: Uploaded on - 01/07/2019 ::: Downloaded ... decided
the issue of fixing the fees of the Receiver by capping the fees at
Rs.50 lakhs. We find from the record that there
court fee of Rs.200 already paid in AIR 547 of 2018 on
the file of the Hon'ble DRAT Chennai.
For Petitioner
dated 05.01.2019 and 21.01.2019
passed by the DRT III, Delhi and the DRAT, Delhi. The same orders were
assailed ... fee of the Court Reciever of Rs. 70,000/-. It is this
order which the petitioner has assailed before the DRAT in the
aforesaid Misc
present writ petition to assail the
order dated 21.01.2019 passed by the DRAT in Misc. Appeal No. 31/2019.
By the said order, the proceedings ... fee of the Court Reciever of Rs.
70,000/-. It is this order which the petitioner has assailed before the DRAT
in the aforesaid Misc
Recovery Tribunal [under section 17 , may
prefer an appeal along with such fee, as may be prescribed] to an
Appellate Tribunal within thirty days from ... receipt of the order
of Debts Recovery Tribunal.
[Provided that different fees may be prescribed for filing an appeal by
the borrower
allowing the two OAs, the
appeals filed by the Petitioners before the DRAT challenging only the orders
passed by the DRT dismissing the review petitions ... maintainable in the first place.
23. Further, the Court finds that the DRAT was fully justified in dismissing
the two appeals for failure
submissions of
learned counsels and are of the view that the DRAT was not
powerless to modify its own order whereby the two court
commissioners ... petitioner/corporate debtor. In the facts of the case,
the learned DRAT should have recalled its order so that the
IRP/RP could take over
absolute
bar on the DRAT entertaining an appeal, unless the pre-deposit is made with
the DRAT by the Appellant of 50% of the amount ... proviso to
Section 21 permits the DRAT to reduce the amount of pre-deposit up to 25%
of the amount of such debt
meters alongwith building
and construction standing therein.) in the proceedings before the
DRAT.
3. Shri Purohit, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Petitioners submitted ... crores
(approximately) with a further fee of Rs. 3 crores admittedly paid to
Respondent no. 1 for acting as Resolution Advisory Officer
