NTPC were governed by a Letter of Award
dated 12.12.2003 and the FIDIC General Conditions of Contract
(hereinafter referred to as „FIDIC Conditions‟) read with ... Under Clause 4.1 of the FIDIC Conditions read with COPA,
Petitioner was permitted to sub-contract the work, awarded to it by NTPC.
Petitioner, thereafter
contract
by invoking Clause 63.1 of the Federation Internationale Des Ingenieurs Conseils
(FIDIC). The appellant by their letter dated 17.08.2009 expressed their concern
over ... addressed letter to the
appellant referring to Clause 63.1 of FIDIC of the contract, wherein it is
stated that after 14 days from the issue
contract was
appropriately Rs.183.71 crores. The parties adopted FIDIC form of
Conditions of Contract with some changes made which are called Conditions
completion can also be worked out by methods
specified in the FIDIC, PWD or CPWD contracts. The
procedure followed in CPWD contracts is quite popular
respondent. The Committee of Arbitrators also observed that in terms of the FIDIC conditions the Appellants would be liable for delay only under certain clauses
contract was
appropriately Rs.183.71 crores. The parties adopted FIDIC form of
3
Conditions of Contract with some changes made which are called
Conditions
also sought to derive strength from the Guide to the use of FIDIC Conditions of Contract for Works of Civil Engineering Construction where while dealing
experience that as per sound
engineering practice based on FIDIC guidelines
adopted in such civil construction contracts, price
adjustment clause is included in the contracts
