period, the complainant was shocked to learn that the said Flight
had been preponed to 19:30 hours and had already taken off. According ... However due to
certain reasons the Flight SG 607, was preponed. The Flight was scheduled to
depart at 21:15 hours but was preponed
courtesy the OP No. 1 advised the complainants to avail of
preponed flight after purchasing the e-tickets, but the ultimate decision in
this regard ... complainants indicated that such preponement was not
permissible. The complainants having
tried to prepone the date of flight though it was not permissible under
42959. The grievance of the
complainant is that Ops preponed her flight 30.11.2015, whereas
7
F. A. No. 961 of 2016
scheduled date ... either OP No.1 or OP No.2 informed her about
preponing the flight for 30.11.2015 instead of scheduled date on
01.12.2015. The reschedule
alleged that the OP did not properly informed him as to preponment of flight and neglected and refused to make any alternative arrangement. Somehow, complainant ... journey from Mumbai to Pune. It is true that due to preponment of flight G - 8352 at 06.25 a.m. on 04.12.2010 the appellant
told that they would have to change the flight
and would have to again board flight which would take them to their
destination ... Frankfurt. It is not disputed that the complainant got the flight preponed . He
does not object to the payment of $516 for this purpose which
complaint of the appellant seeking compensation of Rs. 5 lacs for preponing
the flight by two hours whereby he could not attend the ceremony ... should have made other arrangement or should
have taken the same flight as preponed by the respondent.
5. We
do not find any merit
reply of the petitioner that the flight was preponed
directly by the concerned Airlines and that the OP-1 had no knowledge of the
same ... which the Complainant could not board the flight. It is submitted that the flight
in question was preponed directly by the concerned airline
reply of the petitioner that the flight was preponed
directly by the concerned Airlines and that the OP-1 had no knowledge of the
same ... which the Complainant could not board the flight. It is submitted that the flight
in question was preponed directly by the concerned airline
their return journey, they had discovered that their
scheduled flight had been preponed without any prior intimation. Due to the unilateral change in schedule ... outset, it is not in dispute that the respondents had preponed the flight from Denpasar to
Delhi without giving any prior intimation to the appellants
return air ticket from the
complainant and that he got the flights preponed. He further admits that he had traveled on
the said ticket ... also
proved on record that the accused had got the flights preponed and travelled on air ticket
without making payment of the same. Further
