Fodder
Scam cases, it recorded the statements of one S.B.Sinha, (since died) a king
pin of the Scam known as Fodder Scam ... into account that their
statements had already been recorded in other Fodder Scam cases.
9. The CBI has further come with the plea
recovered, if
ultimately the petitioner is found guilty in the criminal case.
4. A supplementary counter affidavit to the interlocutory application on
behalf of respondents ... suspension of the petitioner was because of
his implication in Fodder Scam Case No.R.C.45(A)/1996 (Pat) and the said
criminal case
case, it appears that the respondent is
involved in Fodder scam case. Thereafter, charges have been framed
against the respondent and the respondent has also
Animal Husbandary Department, was implicated in some of
the Fodder Scam Cases. However, while the trial of the cases
was in progress, the husband
paid to the petitioner. However, the petitioner, who was
involved in Fodder Scam Case, being RC 48A of 1996 was inflicted
rigorous imprisonment
regarding item wise and date wise expenditure incurred on
the case 'fodder scam' pending in CBI Court for the last 17 years ... denied to the appellant.
Decision:
6. The Commission observes that in this case information has been sought from CBI, an
organization to which
motu
passed over the case. It appears that this Court had dealt with the
fact of the case in the order dated ... present case petitioner is claiming his
salary for the period from 21.2.1996 to 31.12.1996.
Petitioner was made accused in different cases of
fodder scam
Pandey
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17349 of 2011
======================================================
Dr.Gauri Shankar Prasad
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus ... present case petitioner is claiming his salary for
the period from 21.2.1996 to 31.12.2996. Petitioner was
made accused in different cases of fodder scam
case of Union of India And Others Vs. Gyan Chand Chattar and also
reported in AIR 1964 SC 364 in the case of Union ... guilty and
convicted in any criminal case. It has falsely been stated that the convicts of
fodder scam left the court room which is said
Director of Animal Husbandry Department and without his
consent, no such fodder scam could take place is perverse under the
fact that admittedly much prior ... just arrive at a
biased conclusion that the case is related to fodder scam and
confirmed the addition without taking into cognizance that no
evidence
