State of Haryana
Shankarshan Dash v. Union of India
(2000) 1 GLR 407 Md. Ibrahim Ali v. State of Assam ... Union of India
P.C. Sethi v. Union of India
(1986) 2 GLR 195 Arunoday Barman v. State of Tripura
(1988) 2 GLR
State of Assam v. Pranesh Dev Nath reported in (1991) 2 GLR 389, it has been held that a Claims Tribunal is a 'Court ... Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Bina Bhattacharjee reported in (2005) 3 GLR 380 : 2006 AIHC 64. It may be pointed out that Bina Bhattacharjee
Kanai Bhuyan and Ors. v. Naresh Chandra Ghosh reported in 1985 (1) GLR 36, Upendra Chandra Deb Roy v. Smt. Subhasini Deb and Ors. reported ... GLR 7 and Hari Shankar Sahu v. Giridharilal Sarmah reported in 1989 (2) GLR (NOC) 33.
9. Resisting the submissions made on behalf
Moinul Islam v. State of Assam and Anr. ( 2003) 3 GLR 268, Rajesh Kumar Himatsingka v. Sachindra Sarmah 2004 (2) GLR 316, Ramjan ... State of Assam 2005 (3) GLR 26.
9. In reply Mr. Choudhury, has contended that the news item not having been proved in accordance with
Manabendu Das Choudhury v. State of Tripura and Ors. (2004) 3 GLR 430 : 2004 Suppl. GLT 877; Ganesh Chetri and Ors. v. Zantsemo Murry ... Suppl. GLT669 : (2005) 2 GLR 74; Smt. Leena Das v. Presiding Officer, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Assam (1987) 2 GLR 135; Jogendra Chandra Skill
Ibrahim Ali v. Hazi Abdul Latif (1989) 1 GLR 70; (iii) P.S. Kona Anal v. State of Manipur and Ors. (1989) 2 GLR ... Sudhansu Ranjan Paul v. Madhav Chandra Paul (1990) 2 GLR 183 and (v) Bhojraj Kunwarji Oil Mill and Ginning Factory v. Y.S. Parihar
Tomba Singh v. State of Manipur and Ors. reported in (1984) 2 GLR 225. The Apex Court in Mohinder Singh Gill (supra) held that validity ... reasons mentioned in the affidavit-in-opposition. Para-8 of the GLR in Laisram Tomba Singh v. State of Manipur and Ors. (supra) reads
charge in Saroj Bhattacharyya v. Union of India and Ors. (2003) 3 GLR 77 and held that if the departmental proceeding is proceeded after knowing ... finding of the court is at Para No. 5 of the GLR which are quoted herein below:
Para No. 3. Mr. A.K. Bhattacharyya, learned
Saharia v. CIT reported in (1995) 216 ITR 217 (Gauhati); (1994) 1 GLR 291). Had it been a case of disclosure of the receipts
given locality. (See Maqbul Hussain v. Syadur Rahman reported in (1986) 2 GLR 167. The final order of the Magistrate is, however subject ... Society Ltd. and Anr. v. Sri Bhabani Gogoi reported in (1991)1 GLR 228 : 1991 Cri LJ 1765.
12. The limited question, therefore, which concerns
