Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 160 (0.83 seconds)

Suraj Prasad vs Union Of India & Ors on 2 May, 2016

been pleased to modify the order of compulsory retirement by giving full benefit of pension and gratuity as per rule 40 of CCS (Pension) Rule ... earlier. Therefore, the disciplinary authority awarded the penalty of compulsory retirement with 80% pension and gratuity as admissible to him. However, considering his obligations towards
Jharkhand High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - P Patnaik - Full Document

Gyan Singh Rawat vs M/O Communications on 1 August, 2016

Disciplinary Authority (DA) imposed the penalty of compulsory retirement and allowed only 2/3rd of pension and gratuity. The statutory appeal submitted by the applicant ... 1352/2014 (v) The reduction in pension and gratuity along with the punishment of compulsory retirement amounted to double jeopardy
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajasthan Urban Co-Operative Bank Ltd. vs . Ajay Kumar Katewa & Ors. on 12 January, 2016

order of compulsory retirement/ retirement of the respondents/writ petitioners was passed. The respondents challenged the order of compulsory retirement by preferring an appeal before ... Rules of 2006) and paid outstanding dues towards gratuity and leave encashment. The orders for retirement/compulsory retirement have been passed by the Board
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - A S Grewal - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next