significant because in a
subsequent judgment of a Coordinate Bench, namely, Harman Electronics Pvt.
Ltd. v. National Panasonic India ... holistic reading has to be read as ‘complainant’.
It appears that Harman transacted business out of Chandigarh only, where
the Complainant also maintained an office
support was
placed upon the decision of this Court in Harman Electronics Private
Limited and Anr. v. National Panasonic India Private Limited ... Magistrate to entertain the complaints. The Revisional
Court relying upon Harman Electronics Private Limited and Anr. v. National
Panasonic India Private Limited
support was placed upon the
decision of this Court in Harman Electronics Private Limited
3
and Anr. v. National Panasonic India Private Limited ... Magistrate to entertain the complaints. The Revisional Court
relying upon Harman Electronics Private Limited and Anr.
v. National Panasonic India Private Limited
Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan ( 1999) 7 SCC
510 and Harman Electronics Private Limited v. National Panasonic India
Private Limited (2009) 1 SCC 720 have
Negotiable Instruments
Act. We say so because in Harman Electronics (P) Ltd. v. National
Panasonic India (P) Ltd. (2009) 1 SCC 720 this Court examined
authority of the decision of this Court in Harman
Electronics (P) Ltd. v. National Panasonic India (P) Ltd. (2009) 1 SCC 720
where this aspect
Negotiable Instruments Act.
We say so because in Harman Electronics (P) Ltd. v.
National Panasonic India (P) Ltd. (2009) 1 SCC 720 this
Court examined
authority of the decision of this Court
in Harman Electronics (P) Ltd. v. National Panasonic India
(P) Ltd. (2009) 1 SCC 720 where this aspect
