Komal Kumar Kedia, Ranchi vs Ito,Ward-1(5), Ranchi on 15 March, 2019
IN
chain of transactions could exceed the
amounts, involved in the high denomination notes,---this also was a pure conjecture
or surmise on the part ... were, came to
the conclusion that the possession of 150 high denomination notes of Rs. 1,000 each
was satisfactorily explained by the appellant
chain of transactions could exceed the
amounts, involved in the high denomination notes,---this also
was a pure conjecture or surmise on the part ... were, came to the conclusion
that the possession of 150 high denomination notes of Rs.
1,000 each was satisfactorily explained by the appellant
Smt. Nita Jhunjhunwala , Howrah vs Ito, Ward - 47(2), Kolkata , Kolkata on 4 January, 2019
Shri Hari Prasad Agarwal , Kolkata vs Ito, Ward - 22(4), Kolkata on 23 January, 2019
Madhu Adukia, Ranchi vs Ito,Ward-2(1), Ranchi on 20 February, 2019
IN THE
chain of transactions could
exceed the amounts, involved in the high denomination notes,--
-this also was a pure conjecture or surmise on the part ... were, came to the
conclusion that the possession of 150 high denomination notes
of Rs. 1,000 each was satisfactorily explained by the appellant
chain of transactions could
exceed the amounts, involved in the high denomination notes,--
-this also was a pure conjecture or surmise on the part ... were, came to the conclusion that the
possession of 150 high denomination notes of Rs.1,000 each
was satisfactorily explained by the appellant
chain of transactions could
exceed the amounts, involved in the high denomination
notes,---this also was a pure conjecture or surmise on the
part ... were, came to
the conclusion that the possession of 150 high denomination
notes of Rs. 1,000 each was satisfactorily explained by the
appellant
chain of transactions could exceed
the amounts, involved in the high denomination notes,---this also was a pure conjecture or
surmise on the part ... were, came to the conclusion that the possession of 150 high denomination notes
of Rs. 1,000 each was satisfactorily explained by the appellant