Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 758 (1.08 seconds)

Kumar vs / on 19 December, 2017

make it illegal gratification and that the prosecution has a further duty to prove that what was paid was an illegal gratification, reference ... make it illegal gratification and that the prosecution has a further duty to prove that what was paid was an illegal gratification, reference

Nileshkumar Narsinhbhai Patel vs The State Of ... on 14 February, 2017

when demand  and acceptance are  not proved  which  are vital ingredients so far as establishing the guilt of accepting  illegal gratification is concerned ... gratification,   namely   demand,   acceptance   and   recovery   of  tainted currency notes. So far as the demand and acceptance of  the illegal gratification are concerned, decoy­punter
Gujarat High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - R P Dholaria - Full Document

The State Of Karnataka vs Mr.Ashoka on 4 March, 2017

abused his official position by illegal means and as a public servant demanded and accepted the illegal gratification of Rs.25,000/- from the complainant ... initial burden of proving that the accused has demanded and accepted the illegal gratification for doing any official act in favour of the complainant
Bangalore District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The State Of Karnataka vs S.Mahesh on 3 June, 2017

accused was trapped while demanding and accepting illegal gratification of Rs.4,000/- from the complainant- M.Nagaraju through CW2-S.Deepu. Eight currency ... about 4-10 p.m., has demanded and accepted illegal gratification of Rs.4,000/- from the complainant- M.Nagaraju through CW2- S.Deepu
Bangalore District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next