under:-
"18. The courts, as a rule, lean against implying
repeal unless the two provisions are so plainly
repugnant to each other than they
between a special and a general statute and an argument
of implied repeal is raised. Even in Kaushalya Rani 's case, the Apex Court
held by the Queen's Bench that
this did not impliedly repeal Section 77, but
that it was competent for the magistrate to
sentence ... effect. We are of the opinion
that the doctrine of implied repeal cannot be
applied in the circumstances of this case
Patna High Court
simple reason that the GST Code does not impliedly or explicitly repeals the provisions of Indian Penal Code or the Code of Criminal Procedure ... provisions of the U.P. Act overrides or expressly or impliedly repeals the provisions of the Penal Code. There is also
between a special and a general statute and an argument
of implied repeal is raised. Even in Kaushalya Rani 's case, the Apex Court
employed in Section 21 will
make it clear that there is an implied bar in the exercise of the High Court's
power under Section ... Code erqticitly says that tfre sld Code has been repealed. Old Code
received the assent of the Governor General on 22.03.1898. At the
inception
Tofan Singh vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 29 October, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIR
D. Devaraja vs Owais Sabeer Hussain on 18 June, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIR 2020 SUPREME
Ami Chand vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 14 September, 2020
Author: Anoop Chitkara
Bench
Shahaab Ali (Miner) And Another vs State Of U.P. on 20 January, 2020
Equivalent