submission that the Central Parliamentary
Act of 1970 would impliedly repeal the 1969 State Act, yet
Section 30(1) of the said Act provides that ... petitioner not only to take up the plea
of repugnancy and implied repeal but also to state as a fact that
what the workmen would
Guidelines, there could be a
5
plausible case of implied repeal. However, a
careful perusal of the Guidelines shows that there
is no stipulation
Vikas Yadav vs State Of U.P And Ors. Etc. Etc on 3 October, 2016
amended by
this Act, stand repealed.”
This Court concluded that Section 41 of the Punjab Courts
Act was repealed because it would amount ... conflict, Section 4 CPC would not save, on
the contrary its language implied would make such
special or local law inapplicable. We may examine
Subramanian Swamy vs Union Of India, Min. Of Law. on 13 May, 2016
Author: Dipak
Sasan Power Limited vs North American Coal Corporation India ... on 24 August, 2016
Reportable
IN
Extra Judicial Execution Victim And ... vs Union Of India And Ors. on 8 July, 2016
Ravindra Ramchandra Waghmare vs Indore Mun.Corp.. on 29 November, 2016
Author: Arun Mishra
Bench
M/S Shanti Conductors(P) Ltd. vs Assam State Electricity Board &Amp Ors. on
Cellular Operators Association Of ... vs Telecom Regulatory Authority Of India . on 11 May, 2016
Author
