submission
that the Central Parliamentary Act of 1970 would impliedly repeal the 1969
State Act, yet Section 30(1) of the said Act provides that ... petitioner not only to take up the plea of repugnancy and implied repeal
but also to state as a fact that what the workmen would
Vikas Yadav vs State Of U.P And Ors. Etc. Etc on 3 October, 2016
amended by this Act, stand repealed.”
This Court concluded that Section 41 of the Punjab Courts Act was
repealed because it would amount ... conflict, Section 4 CPC would not save, on
the contrary its language implied would make such special or local law
inapplicable. We may examine
Jindal Stainless Ltd.& Anr vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 11 November, 2016
State Of H.P & Ors vs Rajesh Chander Sood Etc Etc on 28 September
State Bank Of India vs Santosh Gupta And Anr. Etc on 16 December, 2016
Equivalent
M/S Shanti Conductors(P) Ltd. & Anr vs Assam State Electricity Board & Ors
Cellular Operators Association Of ... vs Telecom Regulatory Authority Of India ... on 11 May, 2016
Equivalent
Union Of India & Ors vs M/S. Cipla Ltd. & Anr on 21 October
Vimal Kishor Shah & Ors vs Jayesh Dinesh Shah & Ors on 17 August, 2016
