Section 52 in Indian Forest Act, 1927 [Entire Act]
confiscation under section 52-A or 52-B shall prevent the indiction of any punishment to which the person affected thereby may be liable under
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29153 (3.50 seconds)Section 155 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
delivered the goods to B. The evidence is admissible. (b) A is indicted for the murder of B. C says that B, when dying, declared
P.V. Narasimha Rao vs State(Cbi/Spe) on 17 April, 1998
British nationality of
one of the persons offering the bribe. The indictment was
sought to be quashed on the ground that bribery of a Member ... member used his position
as member-the agreement would be an
indictable conspiracy." [p. 410]
Gavan Duffy and Starke JJ., in their dissenting
judgment
Balraj Khanna & Ors vs Moti Ram on 22 April, 1971
substance should be set forth verbatim in the statement of
claim or indictment. Again he has referred us to another
passage in the same volume ... proper innuendoes, so also it is necessary to
do so in an indictment where words are of the
essence of the offence." (Page
Bharwad Mepa Dana & Another vs State Of Bombay on 10 November, 1959
certain unspecified persons, who were never put on trial on
the same indictment and about whom no indication was given
by the prosecution either ... Where Several prisoners are included in the same
indictment, the jury may find one guilty and acquit the
others, and vice versa. But if several
Topandas vs The State Of Bombay on 14 October, 1955
paragraph 361:-
"Where several prisoners are included in the same
indictment, the jury may find one guilty and acquit the
others, and vice versa ... several are indicted for a
riot, and the jury acquit all but two, they must acquit
those two also, unless it is charged
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs J.B. Bottling Company Private Limited on 14 March, 1975
Indian Penal Code, a corporate body or a company shall not be indictable for offences which can be committed only by a human individual ... learned Judge that even if a special Act makes a company indictable, it will not be prosecuted if the sentence provided is both corporal
Amrita Lal Hazra And Ors. vs Emperor on 2 February, 1915
Biers (1834) 1 A. & E. 327, the objection to the indictment was upheld on the ground that it misrecited an Act of Parliament ... East P. C. 837, is an authority for the proposition that an indictment for obtaining-property by a false pretence must not only expressly allege
A.D. Jayaveerapandia Nadar & Co. And ... vs Income-Tax Officer on 24 January, 1975
A.D. Jayaveerapandia Nadar & Co. And ... vs Income-Tax Officer on 24 January, 1975
State Of Maharashtra vs Syndicate Transport Co. (P) Ltd. And ... on 26 September, 1963
important question of law regarding the liability of a corporate body for indictment on a criminal charge involving the question of mens ... therefore, a corporate body, like any other person, ought to be indictable for any offence punishable under the Code. Messrs. Mudholkar and Mandpe contended