Sporta Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs John Doe & Anr on 25 February, 2020
Author: Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
Bench: Rajiv Sahai Endlaw ... Plaintiffs
Through: Ms. Shwetasree Majumder &
Ms. Pritika Kohli, Advs.
Versus
JOHN DOE & ANR. ..... Defendants
Through: appearance not given for D-2.
CORAM
Palace, Delhi‖, this Court
had granted an ad interim injunction and John Doe order against all the
Defendants in the said suit. The Court also
stated that the plaintiff would make an
application to implead as John Doe the person who had uploaded the
impugned photographs on the internet ... provides a recourse thereto by impleading the
unknown person as John Doe / Ashok Kumar and by seeking
disclosure of identity thereof from the electronic platforms
noted, defendant no. 65 is Ashok Kumar i.e. the John
Doe defendant(s).
6. Having heard Mr. Sidharth Chopra, who appears on behalf
Defendant number
2 arrayed as Ashok Kumar is based on the John Doe principle as
applicable in India, as the same being an unknown identity
awarded
John
amount is not d isturbed.
Doe
Digitally
signed by
John Doe
Date:
2020.05.22
16:28:46
+0530
e. If the Insurance Comp
without any justifiable cause, to the satisfaction
of the trial Court. John
Doe
Digitally
signed by
John Doe
Date
other defendants sought to be
impleaded as John Doe as defendant No.5, their proprietors, successors,
agents, associates, affiliates from in any manner violating
Ashok Kumar", a term synonymous to the
internationally known "John Doe". Plaintiffs have submitted that upon the
identity of defendant being known
other persons/entities, whose particulars are not known, i.e. John
Doe/Ashok Kumars, who also need to be brought within the ambit ... plaintiff.
6. In respect of the infractions carried out by the John Doe/Ashok
Kumars, the plaintiff is given liberty to approach this Court
