Vinay Tyagi vs Irshad Ali @ Deepak & Ors on 13 December, 2012
unfairness of the investigation is such
that it pricks the judicial conscience of the Court, the Court should be
reluctant to interfere in such matters
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 57 (0.86 seconds)State Of Rajasthan vs Shera Ram @ Vishnu Dutta on 1 December, 2011
hand and acquittal on
the other. The preponderance of judicial opinion of this Court
is that there is no substantial difference between an appeal
against ... justice so require and it is essential
to appease the judicial conscience.
13. Also, this Court had the occasion to state the
principles which
Govindaraju @ Govinda vs State By Sriramapuram P.S. & Anr on 15 March, 2012
hand and acquittal
on the other. The preponderance of judicial opinion of
this Court is that there is no substantial difference
between an appeal against ... justice so require and it is essential to appease the
judicial conscience.
11. Also, this Court had the occasion to state the
principles which
Ramnaresh & Ors vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 28 February, 2012
illustrations,
clearly depicts the various precepts which would govern the
exercise of judicial discretion by the courts within the
parameters spelt out under Section ... committing the crime should be such that it pricks the
judicial conscience of the court to the extent that the only and
inevitable conclusion should
Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik vs The State Of Mahrashtra on 29 February, 2012
committed so brutally that it
pricks or shocks not only the judicial
conscience but even the conscience of the
society.
Mitigating Circumstances :
1. The manner
Brajendrasingh vs State Of M.P on 28 February, 2012
committed so brutally that it pricks or
shocks not only the judicial conscience but even the conscience
of the society.
Mitigating Circumstances :
1. The manner
Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. And ... vs Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. on 24 November, 2005
exceptional or special equities of the kind which would prick the judicial conscience of the court.
iv) When the bank guarantee is not invoked strictly
Continental Construction Ltd. And Anr. vs Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. on 12 January, 2006
exceptional or special equities of the kind which would prick the judicial conscience of the court.
iv) When the bank guarantee is not invoked strictly
Sh. Raj Kumar Sharma vs Smt. Pushpa Jaggi And Ors. on 24 November, 2005
judicial discretion does not admit a limitation extending to a prohibition for grant of relief of specific performance. It is only where the judicial conscience ... performance against such a party.
A lawful agreement being proved and judicial conscience of the court being satisfied the equity would demand enforcement
State Of Maharashtra vs Goraksha Ambaji Adsul on 7 July, 2011
illustrations, clearly
depicts the various precepts which would govern the exercise
of judicial discretion by the Courts within the parameters spelt
out under Section ... committing the crime
should be such that it pricks the judicial conscience of the
Court to the extent that the only and inevitable conclusion
should