between man and state, through reason called law."
13. Judicial restraint and discipline are as necessary to
the orderly administration of justice as they ... goes beyond the mandate of law, judicial
precedents and discipline of judicial restraint. This does amount to
over stepping adjudicatory liberty of expression exercised
goes beyond the
mandate of law, judicial precedents and discipline of
judicial restraint. This does amount to over stepping
adjudicatory liberty of expression exercised ... judicial review or under the writ jurisdiction. Though no restriction can
be imposed upon judicial functioning except guidelines on judicial
strictures and judicial precedents, since
Supreme Court has emphasized the need for judicial
restraint and held that judicial restraint and held that
judicial restraint and discipline are necessary ... orderly administration of justice and observed as under:-
Judicial restraint and discipline are necessary to the
orderly administration of justice as they
Since the present case pertains to the crucial doctrine of judicial
restraint, we are of the considered opinion that encroaching into the right ... would have agreed with Mr. B.B. Singh. The doctrine of
judicial restraint which has been emphasised repeatedly by this Court e.g.
in Aravali
judicial in
nature and should not formally depart from sobriety, moderation and
reserve. Thereafter their Lordships referred to the conception of judicial
restraint, the controlling ... Judicial officer projects the
face of the judicial system and the independence of judiciary at the ground
reality level and derogatory remarks against a judicial
that the power of judges
must not be unbridled and judicial restraint must be exercised, before using strong
and scathing language to criticize any individual ... this Court, speaking through
Justice K Jagannatha Shetty held:
―13. Judicial restraint and discipline are as necessary to the
orderly administration of justice as they
Habeas Corpus is not maintainable.
According to him, the Petitioner was in judicial custody on the date of filing
of the petition. He invited ... Constitution of India should be exercised sparingly with
judicial restraint. He would further submit that in fact the Petitioner had
applied for bail before Chief
Since the present case pertains to the crucial
doctrine of judicial restraint, we are of the considered opinion
that encroaching into the right ... would have agreed with Mr
B.B. Singh. The doctrine of judicial restraint which has
been emphasised repeatedly by this Court e.g.
in Aravali
P. Vijayaraghavan vs The State on 10 April, 2017
Author: T.Mathivanan
Bench: T. Mathivanan
Since the present case pertains to the crucial
doctrine of judicial restraint, we are of the
considered opinion that encroaching into the right ... would have agreed with Mr.
B.B. Singh. The doctrine of judicial restraint
which has been emphasised repeatedly by this
Court e.g. in Aravali
