Health Services to the Nanavati Hospital,
Mumbai for the purpose of a kidney transplant.
5. On or about 24.4.1991, the respondent reached Nanavati Hospital,
Bombay ... rapidly subsided.
14. From 5.6.1991 to 8.6.1991, the respondent insisted on immediate kidney
transplant even though the respondent had advised him that in view
order to remove the
calculus from the Gall Bladder, Bile Duct and Kidney of the complainant. Even the said procedure was not performed ... only be
controlled/managed with subsequent treatment and by removal of one kidney at a
different hospital, namely, Bharat Hospital.
It was also alleged that
Nephrologist, Dr. M.A.
2
Muthusethupathi, OP No.1 who is performing kidney transplant
surgery at Madras and after going through the entire medical record ... patient Naveen Kant, the family took a decision to
undergo for kidney transplantation and on the advice of OP No.1, the
patient Naveen Kant
NCDRC
visited the appellant hospital on 08.10.1996 and was
diagnosed with kidney stone in her right kidney. She was
advised to undergo surgery ... being
examined again at that point, it was noticed that the right
kidney had been severely damaged and the left kidney was
also diagnosed with
sanction and reimburse medical bill amounting to Rs. 1,49.470.90 for transplanting kidney and follow-up treatment. He also claimed interest on the payment which ... Attorney in the Excise and Taxation Department. In January, 1993, he got kidney transplantation in Bombay. The medical bills were submitted for sanction and reimbursement
abdomen.
2.2] On 16/17.07.1989, Dr. Jain suspecting kidney problem
referred Priya Malhotra to Dr. A.Kriplani, a Nephrologist ... Kriplani informed appellant that Priya
Malhotra had kidney failure and chronic renal failure. The
appellant consented for immediate Haemodialysis as was
recommended by the doctor
First petitioner in W.P.(C) No.6473 of 2017 is a
kidney patient and is undergoing treatment at the Medical
Trust Hospital, Ernakulam ... found that both the kidneys of
the 1st petitioner are not functioning properly and therefore,
needs urgent transplantation. Presently 1st petitioner is
undergoing dialysis thrice
simple hysterectomy operation performed on the Complainant on 21.6.1993, she lost her kidney; her ovaries; she was required to undergo various further curative operations, because ... Thirdly, whether the vein can avulse to such an extent that kidney is required to be removed? Or
(iv). As there is no explanation
respondents to accord approval to the petitioners for effecting
transplant of kidney from petitioner No. 2 to petitioner No. 1.
2. The respondents ... year 2008. At that stage, the falling condition of her
kidney was diagnosed. It is stated that she has been receiving
W.P.(C) 2574
greatly affected her health. While she was in this state of health, kidney pain supervened and from the shock of this she died. The facts ... died he stated that she had a severe pain in her kidneys, that on the day previous she was in a normal state of health
