Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 45349 (7.49 seconds)

Abdul Rafiq vs Bhajan on 12 May, 1931

acknowledgment the claim acknowledged had not become barred by time. It was not a case where acknowledgment is a new contract in which limitation runs ... relevant clause of the Limitation Act . It required to be laid down that in order to save limitation an acknowledgment must be made before
Allahabad High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Maganlal Harjibhai vs Amichand Gulabji on 14 February, 1928

purposes of limitation, take the Gregorian calendar, which governs limitation according to Section 25 of the Indian Limitation Act. 2. The learned Subordinate Judge held ... acknowledgment, Exhibit 57, therefore, is not a valid acknowledgment, and Exhibit 48, which was a subsequent acknowledgment would not save limitation. The plaintiffs' claim
Bombay High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Jeevraj And Anr. vs Lalchand And Ors. on 26 August, 1968

period of limitation is enough to start a fresh period of limitation, and it is enough not only when the acknowledgment is unconditional but even ... conditional or unconditional acknowledgment, he will have to show that the acknowledgment was obtained by him before the period of limitation had expired. In other
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 49 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Sandeep Jindal vs State Bank Of India on 8 April, 2021

provisions of the Limitation Act to submit that in order to apply Article 137 of the Limitation Act , other provisions of Limitation ... date on which the acknowledgment is signed. However, the acknowledgment must be made before the period of limitation expires. 67. As observed above, Section 238A
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Cites 67 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next