Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 57 (0.85 seconds)

M.Balaji vs Perimjanardhana Rao

cheque in question has been lost. The said document reads as follows:- "This is to inform you that the following signed cheques are missing ... were lost or misplaced or entrusted with Krishnamurthy are all falsehoods. 42.In cross-examination, the defendant has admitted that he has signed

M/S.Divya Fashions vs M.Selvaraj

contended that even as per paper publication dated 29.05.2015, the Petition cheque was lost during transit, while he was travelling in TVS 50 and therefore ... cheque No.793549 (subject cheque) and other cheque and settlement deed were lost. Thus both the Courts below has come to the conclusion that
Madras High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Arun Kapur vs Mrs. Sujatha Hariharan

confidence reposed on the second respondent by the petitioner has already lost as is evident from the letters dated 08.03.2004 and 15.03.2004. When these ... second respondent/arbitrator holds a power of attorney and a cheque signing authority in the project, which is the subject matter of the present dispute
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - R Subbiah - Full Document

Mohan vs Viswanathan

appear thereon; (f) as to stamp.- that a lost promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque was duly stamped; (g) that holder is a holder ... counsel would further submit that the admission of the signature in the cheque itself would give rise to such presumption under Section

R.Prakash vs T.Sivakumar

appellant and the respondents, the claim of the appellant that the cheque, which is alleged to have been issued, which has since been dishonoured ... signed cheques were given by the respondents to the appellant for carrying out the day-to-day activities of the organisation cannot be lost sight
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - M Dhandapani - Full Document

K.V.Suresh vs /

paying slip marked as Ex.P.9. The cheque submitted along with Ex.P.9 [pay-in-slip] is permitted to be purchase ... withdrawn through 3rd party. 26. The cheque sent for collection to Canara Bank, Mellur Branch, lost its way and the said amount not been realized

Raja Sampathkumar vs Arumugam

such address was there. The accused who have claimed that the cheque was not issued to the complainant have admitted issuance of ten cheques ... purpose of availing loan. This is not a case of lost cheque. The contention that the accused / complainant and Panchanathan are employees of one Rathnasamy
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - R Hemalatha - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next