same cannot be
used against him.
With regard to quantum of maintenance, it is submitted that as
the respondent is working in a rice sheller ... This brings the Court to another issue in regard to quantum of
maintenance payable to the petitioners. The petitioner reiterated her version
that the respondent
maintenance is not barred under law.
The petition is allowed. The order dated 18.04.2014 is set aside
to the extent of refusing any maintenance ... attained finality
and that petitioner No.1 is legally entitled for maintenance. Quantum of
maintenance be determined on the basis of the evidence already available
maintenance from
the petitioner. The respondent is well qualified and has done masters in
education, therefore, she does not deserve to get maintenance ... employed or has a source of income.
So far as the quantum of maintenance, maintenance includes
money to satisfy the needs of food, housing, clothing
short 'the Act'),
`15,000/- per month as maintenance pendente lite were allowed to
the wife from the date of filing ... lower court, there is no ground to interfere on
the quantum of maintenance awarded in the present proceedings.
Therefore, the present revision petition stands dismissed
salary, this fact
has not been taken into consideration while granting the
maintenance by the Courts below. Thus, both the Courts below
have erred while ... filed the petition i.e. CRM-M-13303 of 2013
challenging quantum of maintenance. The respondent-husband has
stated that since the petitioner-wife
order dated 1.8.2014 passed by
the Family Court granting maintenance in favour of the wife and
minor child by taking a view that the wife ... require examination
in the instant revision petition is with regard to quantum of
maintenance.
9. The scope and purpose behind Section 125 of the
Code
still minor. The perusal of this compromise
nowhere shows that any maintenance on behalf of these minor
daughters was given to their mother with whom ... from this Court.
As already discussed, nothing has been argued regarding
quantum of maintenance by the petitioner. He only argued on the
basis of compromise
calls for no intervention and is upheld.
13. Coming to the quantum of maintenance, Lata Ahuja pleaded
that Rajesh Ahuja is earning more than
supporting evidence about the cruel attitude of his wife.
On the quantum of maintenance, there is a bald
statement of petitioner as RW1 that
month. Thus, the petitioners prayed for grant of
maintenance @ Rs.30,000/- per month.
The respondent-husband filed written statement, wherein,
though he admitted ... petitioners observed as under:-
"17. As far as quantum of maintenance is
concerned, the petitioner No.2 has alleged the income of
the respondent
