Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

India. 6. Contending that right to administer the property does not mean maladministration of the property, Mr. R.Ramasamy, learned Addl. Advocate General inter alia

Plaintiffs in that suit C.S.No.242 of 1996 alleging maladministration, mismanagement and siphoning of funds by both the first respondent Trust as well ... Management of the first respondent. According to him, there is maladministration, mismanagement and siphoning of funds by the trustees of the first respondent Trust

given in the explanation. Other charges are also relating to the maladministration of the trust resulting in loss of income or relating to the failure

Trust and they have not convened Mahasabha meeting alleging mismanagement and maladministration. Plaintiffs have filed O.S.No.310 of 1986 for removal of Defendants ... took over the charge. There was no mismanagement or maladministration as alleged by the Plaintiffs and the suit is highly motivated. According to Defendants

Madurai, dated 03.10.1988, were received by the HR&CE Department regarding maladministration of the temple which necessitated them to issue notice for production ... Vishwanathar Temple at Varanasi. The Kashi Vishwanathar Temple was being subject to maladministration along with theft and loss of jewellery and other assets belonging

Karur. The learned Additional Advocate General submitted that only because of the maladministration of the petitioner, the impugned order came to be passed ... under Section 203 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, 1994, for the maladministration of Nerur Village Panchayat had taken away the right of financial transaction

very serious charges of misappropriation of funds of the temple and of maladministration of the lands of the temple. It was further pointed out that ... stated that the petitioner had indulged herself in large scale maladministration of the lands of the temple and in misappropriation of the golden jewellery items

respondent is in violation of CSI Constitution amounts to maladministration, the Writ is maintainable. 8. The Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner has relied upon ... right of minority Institution to administer does not include the right of maladministration, at the same time merely receiving grand-in-aid from the State

administration of the temple by the hereditary trustees and their maladministration has prompted the authorities concerned to direct them to hand over the possession ... passing the impugned order, the order becomes unsustainable, thereto there was no maladministration nor irregularity on the part of the hereditary trustees at any point

appropriate action against the respondents 4 and 5 for their illegal encroachment, maladministration and misappropriation of temple property and income of Arulmighu Ayyanar Temple ... petitioner's representation dated 02.01.2026 for ensuring to curtain maladministration and misappropriation of temple property and income of our clan deity temple, within