Associate Builders vs.
Delhi Development Authority (2015) 3 SCC 49, relying upon
McDermott International Inc. vs. Burn Standard ... something that
no fair-minded or reasonable person could do.
43. In McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard
Co. Ltd. [McDermott International Inc. v. Burn
Builders vs. Delhi Development Authority reported as
2015 (3) SCC 49;
b. McDermott International Inc. vs. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. & Ors.
reported ... something
that no fair-minded or reasonable person could do.
43. In McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co.
Ltd. [McDermott International Inc. v. Burn
Associate Builders vs. Delhi Development
Authority (2015) 3 SCC 49, relying upon McDermott International Inc. vs.
Burn Standard ... something that
no fair-minded or reasonable person could do.
43. In McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard
Co. Ltd. [McDermott International Inc. v. Burn
formula which has been
recognised by the Supreme Court in McDermott International Inc. v. Burn
Standard Co. Ltd. & Ors. (2006) 11 SCC 181 (hereinafter ... McDermott‟).
15. The findings of the Arbitrator are clear. The relevant paragraphs are
set out below: -
"120. .........Admittedly, the respondent has granted
5 extensions
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. vs Delhi Airport Metro Express Private ... on 15 January, 2019
something that no fair-minded or reasonable person could do.
43. In McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co.
Ltd. ,(2006) 11 SCC 181 this
Supreme Court in the
case of McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd.
and Ors , (2006)11SCC181 held as under
something that no fair-minded or reasonable
person could do.
43. In McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co.
Ltd. ,(2006) 11 SCC 181 this
material placed on record does not warrant any interference.
In McDermott International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. (2006) 11 SCC
181, this Court held
Arbitrator has further relied upon the judgment of the
Supreme Court in McDermott International Inc. vs. Burn Standard
Co. Ltd. and Others
