extracted hereunder:
“ehd; gs;sp khzt, khztpah;fs; khh;f;Ffs;
mDg;gr; nrhy;yp gy jlit nrhy;yp
gadpy ... 20879 to 20881 of 2017
nryT fzf;Ffis mDg;gr; nrhy;ypAk;,
mDg;gtpy;iy. etk;gh; 2011ypUe;J [dthp, gpg;uthp
2012Yk
irregularities and as per Marketing Discipline Guidelines,
4
2001 [for brevity, "MDG-2001] and penal action was taken. It was
also held that ... Inspection/08, dated 03-12-2008 under Clause 14 of the
MDG-2001, as the major irregularity was established against the
distributorship
such in Jatni Mukhya Dak
Ghar, the Post Master of Jatni MDG committed some mischief in his own
account amounting ... order of his immediate authority i.e. Postmaster of Jatani MDG
and the supervisor. The article of charges is as under :
Article-1
Sri Guru
which is
against public policy of India as every rule of MDG Guidlines
2012 is mandatory and not directory.
OMP (COMM.) No. 44/2018 ... between the parties as also the Marketing Discipline Guideline, 2012 (in short
MDG) issued by Oil Marketing Companies which have the approval of the
Government
terminated on account
of malpractices/ irregularities/ breach of
Distributorship Agreement/ Violation of
MDG. This will not however come in the
way of consideration of decision ... which may be made by the
terminated dealership under the
provision of MDG.
4.2 In cases other than 4.1 above (for
reasons beyond the control
agreement or the Marketing Discipline Guidelines, 2012 (for short "MDG").
However, respondent No.3 had issued a termination letter dated 14.07.2015 inter
alia ... filed an appeal on 24.08.2015 as provided under Clause 8.9 of MDG.
The respondent No.2 afforded an opportunity of personal hearing, passed order
imposed penalty of Rs.1,42,526/- as violation of 2 nd MDG
(Marketing Discipline Guidelines) during last two years and
adjusted recovery from ... award is bad in the eyes of law because 1 st MDG was set
aside by the Court on challenge by the appellant
imposed penalty of Rs.1,42,526/- as violation of 2 nd MDG
(Marketing Discipline Guidelines) during last two years and
adjusted recovery from ... award is bad in the eyes of law because 1 st MDG was set
aside by the Court on challenge by the appellant
carried out on 25.04.2012 observing some violations
of Marketing Discipline Guidelines, 2005 (MDG) and
supplies of the product was suspended with immediate
effect. At this ... that as per the letter
dated 25.04.2012, if some violation of the MDG was
noticed, why the supply was made to the petitioner
carried out on 25.04.2012 observing some violations
of Marketing Discipline Guidelines, 2005 (MDG) and
supplies of the product was suspended with immediate
effect. At this ... that as per the letter
dated 25.04.2012, if some violation of the MDG was
noticed, why the supply was made to the petitioner
