4226/2022
6
(b) handed over to a witness merely to
refresh his memory.]
9. Thus, it is clear that the documents at a later
plaint, or handed over to a witness
merely to refresh his memory. Clearly, the case of the defendant no.
1/applicant does not fall
witnesses, or
3
(b) handed over to a witness merely to refresh his
memory."
7. The case of the petitioner does not fall under
witnesses, or
(b) handed over to a witness merely to refresh
his memory.]"
4. It would be evident from the aforesaid provision that
witnesses, or, handed
over to a witness merely to refresh his memory."
After perusal of the aforesaid provision, it is evident that the
documents
witnesses, or
(b) handed over to a witness merely to refresh his
memory."
The aforesaid statutory provision of law certainly empowers
the defendant
alleged by the Plaintiffs and was only for the purpose of
refreshing the memory of the witness. Accordingly, the objection cannot be
sustained
copy of their statements to read and understand. Even
after refreshing their memories they were not asked any question and the
deposition is more
Witness during his cross-
examination to contradict him or to refresh the memory
of a witness. It is clear from Order 13, Rule
witnesses, or, handed over to a witness
merely to refresh his memory." (emphasis supplied) Having regard to
Order VII Rule 14 CPC , the documents
