obtained said deed of gift dated
02.12.1970 by practising fraud, misrepresentation and undue influence upon the
plaintiff in the name of obtaining a power ... alleged deed of
gift dated 2.12.1970 was not vitiated by fraud or misrepresentation and that said
document was not executed by practising fraud upon
thus, got an ex parte decree by practising fraud and
misrepresentation. So, the said contention should be
incorporated.
It may be noted herein that previously ... said Act and there is no scope of considering
whether fraud and misrepresentation had been practised in respect
of the suit being Title Suit
deduction unless erroneous fixation is by reason of any fraud or
misrepresentation on the part of the petitioner. It is not the
case ... excess amount was not paid on account of
any misrepresentation or fraud on the part
of the employee and (b) if such excess payment
excess amount was not paid an
account of any misrepresentation or fraud on the part of the employee
and (b) if such excess payment ... overdrawal/excess amount was not paid on account of any
misrepresentation or fraud on the part of the employee
Or (2) Such excess payment
permitted if excess of payment is
made as a result of misrepresentation, fraud or collusion.
The tribunal, therefore, directed refund of said
permitted if
excess of payment is made as a result of misrepresentation, fraud or
collusion.
The tribunal, therefore, directed refund of said
should not
be recovered; it having been paid without any misrepresentation or fraud on their part.
26. From the record that has been produced before ... excess amount was not paid on account of
any misrepresentation or fraud on the part of the employee and (b) if such excess payment
should not
be recovered; it having been paid without any misrepresentation or fraud on their part.
26. From the record that has been produced before ... excess amount was not paid on account of
any misrepresentation or fraud on the part of the employee and (b) if such excess payment
should not
be recovered; it having been paid without any misrepresentation or fraud on their part.
3
26. From the record that has been produced ... excess amount was not paid on account of
any misrepresentation or fraud on the part of the employee and (b) if such excess payment
excess amount was not paid on account of
any misrepresentation or fraud on the part
employee and (b) if such excess payment was
made ... nobody's
case that erroneous fixation was due to any fraud or misrepresentation on the
part of the petitioner. The respondents are liable
