Member Secretary. Petitioner
was forced to put a Note about the missing file and sign the same in the
backdate, on the pretext that ... giving the
files. Petitioner made an attempt to reconstruct the missing file and put up a
Note dated 03.01.2017, which was seen by Respondent
29th September, 1986, noted as follows:
"nos. 85, 271,these files are missing. It is not their fault, they be regularized as others ... case was for some reason not considered because the relevant files were missing. When these facts were drawn to the notice of the Minster
like Power of Attorney, Indemnity Bond,
carrier receipts etc. were missing in those files which I had seized."
However, he could not remember ... show what had
happened to the documents found missing in the files seized.
According to learned counsel for the Appellants, unless the seizure
East) the details of the steps taken to trace out the missing file were given. It was pointed out that in the year
counsel for Mohd Akhtar has also contended that the
delay in filing the missing report is reflective of the abnormal conduct of
the family ... conduct on his part yet the wife did not attempt to file the missing
person report or of abduction of her husband after receiving ransom
counsel for Mohd Akhtar has also contended that the
delay in filing the missing report is reflective of the abnormal conduct of
the family ... conduct on his part yet the wife did not attempt to file the missing
person report or of abduction of her husband after receiving ransom
counsel for Mohd Akhtar has also contended that the
delay in filing the missing report is reflective of the abnormal conduct of
the family ... conduct on his part yet the wife did not attempt to file the missing
person report or of abduction of her husband after receiving ransom
name of TRI-VOBIT
2 and hence, the plaintiff missed filing objections to the registration of the said
trade mark. It is pointed out that
like Power of Attorney, Indemnity Bond,
carrier receipts etc. were missing in those files which I had seized."
However, he could not remember ... show what had
happened to the documents found missing in the files seized.
According to learned counsel for the Appellants, unless the seizure
counsel for Mohd Akhtar has also contended that the
delay in filing the missing report is reflective of the abnormal conduct of
the family ... conduct on his part yet the wife did not attempt to file the missing
person report or of abduction of her husband after receiving ransom
