Member Secretary. Petitioner
was forced to put a Note about the missing file and sign the same in the
backdate, on the pretext that ... giving the
files. Petitioner made an attempt to reconstruct the missing file and put up a
Note dated 03.01.2017, which was seen by Respondent
submitted that respondents be granted some time to re-construct the missing file and conclude the proceedings with expedition.
8. Learned counsel for the petitioner ... filed, the respondents have passed orders for re-constructions of the missing file and no action has been taken by them in the intervening period
response. Some of the files regarding allotment of
plots were found to be missing. The; petitioners
alleged that some of the plot holders illegally sold
Whether the petitioner had
manipulated by not making available the
files relating to his promotion?
6.1 It was submitted that the
respondent-GPCB ... come to the conclusion that
though it is true that two files were
missing in the year 1994 but for that
levelling allegation of motive
explanation is sought to be given as to
how original files went missing and steps that are being taken to restore
the files ... footing basis so as to
enable to produce the missing files before this Hon'ble Court without fail,
the record rooms of Taluk office
reason for such
rejection was that tracing out of a missing file did not amount to discovery of new
facts or evidence and hence ... assigned for failure to finalize the proceeding was that the relevant
file went missing and could not be traced out for nearly a decade. However
employment file
of the petitioner which the respondents never produced before the
enquiry officer by stating that the file was missing due to the
petitioner ... stating that the
file itself was missing and by putting the blame upon the petitioner for
the missing file. This becomes important in view
file for consideration to the Deputy Inspector
General of Police (M&P), Nagaland. Unfortunately the whole file along
with note sheet were found missing ... clearly noted that when directions were given to reconstruct the
file, missing file suddenly appeared in the office of Director General
of Police, Nagaland
appellant was not given a reasonable he
was denied access to several files which ` on his defence.
The trial court had relied upon the following ... October 18, 1955 stating that he had no idea of the missing
files till his return from privilege leave in the first week
of July
29th September, 1986, noted as follows:
"nos. 85, 271,these files are missing. It is not their fault, they be regularized as others ... case was for some reason not considered because the relevant files were missing. When these facts were drawn to the notice of the Minster
