under Section
30(1)(iii) of the ancient Monument & Archeological Sites &
Remains Act.
The prosecution case, as lodged by the informant,
is that
Treasure Act and Section
30(1) (III) of Ancient Monument and Archaeological Sites and
Remains Act were also added.
The name of petitioner surfaced
Treasure Act and Section 30(i)(iii) of Ancient
Monuments and Archeological Sites and Remains Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner
Act and section 30(1)(iii) of the Ancient Monument and
Archeological Sites & Remains Act.
Petitioner is not named in the first information
report
Act and section 30 (i) (iii) of the Ancient
Monument and Archeological Sites & Remains Act.
Neither petitioner is named in the first information report
Antiquities Act and section 30 (I) (III) of
the Ancient Monument and Archeological Act, 1958.
The petitioner is not named in the First Information
Report
Treasure Act and Section
30(i)(iii) Ancient Monument and Archeological Sites & Remains
Act was added.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Treasure Act and
Section 30(i)(iii) Ancient Monument and Archeological Sites
& Remains Act was added.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Indian Penal Code,
25 Antiques and Treasure Act and 30(1)(iii) Ancient Monument
and Archeological Sites and Remains Act.
Petitioner is not named
Penal Code and 30(iii) of the Ancient
Monuments and Archeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 .
It is submitted that there is one case against
