Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions Act and Prevention of Unfair
Labour Practices Act, 1971 (for short, “MRTU”), thereby alleging that the
management therein had engaged ... Industrial Court, on the
basis of a complaint under the MRTU Act, cannot abolish a labour contract
and issue a direction to the industry
Act for rejecting the Review Application. That Section 59 bars
proceedings under the ID Act (Central Act ) or Bombay Industrial
Relations Act, 1996 (Bombay Act ... Act."
(Central Act means Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Bombay Act means
Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - presently known as Maharashtra
Industrial Relations Act
MRTU & PULP Act, the recourse to the Industrial Disputes Act
was barred. Section 59 of the MRTU & PULP Act is extracted below ... MRTU & PULP Act were to be
instituted, under the Industrial Disputes Act or under the Bombay Act ,
then no proceedings could be entertained
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions
and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (MRTU and PULP
Act ). The Industrial Court has directed Petitioner ... Schedule IV of IV of the MRTU & PULP
MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 ? Act
5 Whether the appointments of Complainants are In the Negative
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions
and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (MRTU and PULP
Act ). The Industrial Court has directed Petitioner ... Schedule IV of IV of the MRTU & PULP
MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 ? Act
5 Whether the appointments of Complainants are In the Negative
employee"
under Section 3(5) of the MRTU & PULP Act and further held that
the respondent had failed to establish the allegations levelled ... employee" as
defined under Section 3(5) of the MRTU & PULP Act and that the
Labour Court had committed an error in dismissing
Court has no jurisdiction to
entertain the complaint under the MRTU and PULP Act .
5. The petitioner has further contended that the complainant
was appointed ... Standing Orders) Act . That judgment deals with the limited issue
whether the Standing Orders Act directly governs such institutions.
However, the MRTU and PULP Act
Court has no jurisdiction to
entertain the complaint under the MRTU and PULP Act .
5. The petitioner has further contended that the complainant
was appointed ... Standing Orders) Act . That judgment deals with the limited issue
whether the Standing Orders Act directly governs such institutions.
However, the MRTU and PULP Act
Court has no jurisdiction to
entertain the complaint under the MRTU and PULP Act .
5. The petitioner has further contended that the complainant
was appointed ... Standing Orders) Act . That judgment deals with the limited issue
whether the Standing Orders Act directly governs such institutions.
However, the MRTU and PULP Act
Act, 1946 , as well as under the provisions of the MRTU
and PULP Act, 1971 and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 .
8. The Petitioners further ... practice falling
under Item 5 of Schedule IV of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971 .
9. In the above circumstances, the Petitioners instituted
Complaint
