Siddik Mahomed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 PC 57(1) ; and, Hem Chand v. Pearey Lal , AIR 1942 PC 64.
These decisions firmly establish
their Lordships of the Privy Council in Siddik Mahomed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 PC 57 (1) (C), where a claim has never been
Judicial Committee in the case of Sadique Mohammad Sah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 Privy Council 57 (1) had observed that no amount of evidence
plaint. Reference may be made to Siddik Mohommed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 PC 57 (1) where it was observed that no amount
Judicial Committee in --'Siddik Mohammad Shah v. Mt. Saran', AIR 1930 PC 57 (1) (F), no amount of evidence can be looked into
plaint. He relied upon the cases of Siddik Mahomed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 PC 57 (1) (B) and Rajendra Prasad Singh v. Governor
made to the case of Siddik Mahomed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 P.C. 57 (1), in which it has been laid down that
been placed on the cases reported in Siddik Mahomed Shah v. Mt. Saran. AIR 1930 PC 57 (1) (B), Lala Hem Chand v. Lala Pearoy
referred to the case of Siddik Mahomed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 PC 57 (1), where it was laid down that no amount
matter, relying upon the cases of Siddik Mahommed Shah v. Mt. Saran, AIR 1930 PC 57 (1), Lala Hem Chand v. Lala Pearey