spectrum
in 2500 MHz band was allocated to BSNL and MTNL in
2007-08. However 160 MHz spectrum was surrendered by
them. TRAI has been ... spectrum in this
band, including that surrendered by the BSNL/MTNL is
available. It is humbly submitted that channeling plan
adopted in India
Delhi High
Court Act, 1966 by the Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited
('MTNL' hereafter), challenges the order dated 11th April, 2017 passed ... passed by the sole
arbitrator in a dispute between FCL and MTNL.
To the extent necessary, we first note the facts giving rise
Finolex Cables Limited vs Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (Mtnl) on 11 April, 2017
Author: S.Muralidhar
Bench: S. Muralidhar
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ... Khanna and Mr B.S. Sai,
Advocates.
versus
MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. (MTNL) ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Vaibhav Kalra
January 10, 2017.
+ O.M.P. 378/2009
MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LIMITED (MTNL).. Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Ms. Neha Bhatnagar
and Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri ... Arbitration and Conciliation Act,
1996 („Act‟) by the Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited („MTNL‟)
challenges an Award dated 29th December, 2000 of the sole Arbitrator
(Respondent
case as the value of the material supplied to
the MTNL was not mentioned separately in the
invoices of MIs HCL Infosystems ... Work Payment mode Income Tax
Project Code No.
1. Supply of MTNL- 1,212,569,984/- 24,251,400
equipment 00002497
installation
testing
commissioning
Mtnl vs M/S Motorola Inc. on 31 March, 2017
Author: S. Muralidhar
Bench: S. Muralidhar
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ... Date of decision on: March 31, 2017
+ O.M.P. 11/2014
MTNL ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. L.N. Anchal, Advocate.
versus
MOTOROLA INC. ..... Respondent
Through
Advocates.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR
JUDGMENT
21.04.2017
1. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited („MTNL‟) has filed this petition
under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation ... March, 2003 passed by the Arbitral
Tribunal („AT‟) in the disputes between MTNL and the Respondent,
Haryana Telecom Limited („HTL‟).
2. The background facts
MURALIDHAR
ORDER
% 02.03.2017
1. This petition by Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited („MTNL‟),
challenges an Award dated 9th August, 2008 passed by the learned sole
Arbitrator ... dispute between MTNL and the Respondent, Anant Raj
Agencies Private Limited, arising out of the agreement/lease deed dated 1st
June, 1992 whereby the area
staff no. (GO-101519) under G.M. (Dev.), MTNL,
New Delhi during the period 2001-02, 2002-03, 2003-04
and 2004-05 has committed ... Approx.
1956 telephone poles have been bungled and causing
heavy loss to MTNL i.e. Rs.25,03,680 (Annex. „B‟). He
is responsible
Chairman And M.D. Mtnl vs Reliance Infocom Ltd. on 22 August, 2017
Item No. 44 1
REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII ... SANJAY PARIHAR
Civil Appeal No(s). 2513/2007
CHAIRMAN AND M.D. MTNL Appellant(s)
VERSUS
RELIANCE INFOCOM LTD. & ANR. Respondent(s)
WITH
