direct the
respondents-Mysore Urban Development Authority
(hereinafter referred to as 'MUDA' for short) to allot
site under the incentive scheme ... Court, having considered the rival contentions,
passed certain directions directing the respondent-
MUDA to allot a site under the incentive scheme from
common, raised against the respondents - State and
Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA), these
matters are clubbed, heard together and disposed of by
this common order ... quash the
preliminary notification dated 03.04.2006 issued by the 2nd
respondent - MUDA under Section 17(1) of the Karnataka
Urban Development Authority Act, 1987 insofar
succeeded by the Mysore Urban
Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as 'MUDA'). From out
of the acquired land, 55 acres was allotted ... that since several unauthorized
constructions were found in Sy.No.1, the MUDA issued a Notification
dated 09.01.1989 inviting applications for regularization of the dwelling
appears that pursuant to
directions issued by the State Government, the
respondent-MUDA took action to cancel the allotments
made in favour of the persons ... relevant to notice here that the State
Government has indeed informed the MUDA to
consider the cases of such of the petitioners who had
paid
site by the respondent-
Mysuru Urban Development Authority (for short, 'MUDA')
under the Ex-servicemen category, since the husband of
the petitioner ... same was submitted before the MUDA on the
same day along with a representation. Again on
13.10.2001, the petitioner secured another Demand Draft
respondent -
Mysore Urban Development Authority (hereinafter
referred to as "MUDA"), in the year 1991. The appellant
herein belongs to scheduled Tribe category ... initial deposit. Considering the application of the
appellant, the respondent-MUDA allotted a site bearing
No.10924 measuring 20'x30' in Vijayanagar
plan sanctioned
from the first respondent-Mysore Urban Development
Authority (MUDA) for the purpose of developing a
residential layout comprising of about 626 sites ... Taluk.
3. The undisputed facts are that the layout was
sanctioned by MUDA on 11.02.2009 under Section
32 of the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities
learned counsel for the
petitioners and learned counsel for the respondent-
MUDA, this Court finds that the petitioners seem to
be aggrieved by the fact ... Authorities have
directed the petitioners to get an endorsement from
the respondent-MUDA that the land in question has
not been notified. When the petitioners
Town Planning
Member of the Mysore Urban Development Authority (for
short "MUDA").
2. The petitioner, who is the owner of 27 guntas ... 14362/2021
dated 12.01.2022, pertaining to the respondent -
MUDA, nevertheless the learned counsel for the
respondent - MUDA submitted that the said decision has
been questioned
respondent-Mysore Urban Development
Authority (hereinafter referred to as 'the MUDA', for short)
to grant permission to increase the land ... other societies, this Court by
order dated 26.03.2013 directed the respondent-MUDA to
consider the grievances of the petitioner-society after
