engagement of the petitioner as daily wage beldar on
of
muster roll basis on 1.5.2000 has specifically denied that work of
Clerk was being extracted
regard to engagement of the petitioner as daily wage beldar on
muster roll basis on 1.10.1999 has specifically denied that work of
of
Clerk
were engaged by the
respondent/department on daily wage basis on muster roll in the
years, 1997, 1999, 1998 (respectively) and they continued to work
were engaged by the
respondent/department on daily wage basis on muster roll in the
years, 1997, 1999, 1998 (respectively) and they continued to work
engaged by the respondent on daily wage basis on muster roll w.e.f.
November, 1999, and he continued to work in this capacity upto
were engaged by the
respondent/department on daily wage basis on muster roll in the
years, 1997, 1999, 1998 (respectively) and they continued to work
were engaged by the
respondent/department on daily wage basis on muster roll in the
years, 1997, 1999, 1998 (respectively) and they continued to work
were engaged by the
respondent/department on daily wage basis on muster roll in the
years, 1997, 1999, 1998 (respectively) and they continued to work
were engaged by the
respondent/department on daily wage basis on muster roll in the
years, 1997, 1999, 1998 (respectively) and they continued to work
were engaged by the
respondent/department on daily wage basis on muster roll in the
years, 1997, 1999, 1998 (respectively) and they continued to work
