also assailed the order dated 10.01.2020 whereby the application for discharge has been rejected as well as the summoning order dated ... means of impugned order.
I have heard the counsel for the parties and perused the record.
In the impugned order, the learned trial court
Subsequently, the petitioner proceeded for mutation under Section 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901. In the mutation proceedings the private respondent filed ... sell with other co-sharers. The mutation application of the petitioner was rejected by means of order dated 16.09.2017. Being aggrieved by order dated
Subsequently, the petitioner proceeded for mutation under Section 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901. In the mutation proceedings the private respondent filed ... sell with other co-sharers. The mutation application of the petitioner was rejected by means of order dated 16.09.2017. Being aggrieved by order dated
petitioners seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned judgment and order dated 06.03.2020, passed by the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, Barabanki, whereby Case ... Names of the petitioners were mutated in the revenue records vide order dated 10.07.2000, passed by the Naib Tehsildar, Haidergarh, Barabanki. The property in question
Section 2191 of U.P. Z.A. and L.R. Act against order datd 10.04.2018, passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, with regard to land ... deed dated 12.10.2015. Petitioner's name was mutated in the revenue records by means of order dated 30.11.2015, passed by Tehsildar - Tiloi. Subsequently
order impugned dated 13.9.2019 passed by Additional Commissioner (Administration), Lucknow has been challenged wherein he has rejected the application for recall of order dated ... moved an application for mutation in the revenue records before Tehsildar, Mishrikh, District Sitapur and on 27.6.1985 an order was passed in his favour. Subsequently
learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondent ... direction to the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Amethi, District - Amethi to decide mutation application dated 22.1.2019 ( Ram Prakash and another Vs. Shashi Kala ), expeditiously
Standing counsel for respondent No.1.
In the light of the proposed order, notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with.
Petitioner has approached this ... mutation before opposite party No.1 on 24.6.2019. He has also annexed along with the writ petition a copy of the order sheet which indicates
learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to respondent ... direction to the Tehsildar, Gauriganj, Tehsil - Gauriganj, District - Amethi to decide mutation Case No. T 201804710104654 - Rama Vs. Ram Prasad, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel
whereby he has rejected the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order of Stamp Collector/Additional Magistrate (Finance & Revenue), Bahraich dated ... that on the basis of the said sale deed the land was mutated in the revenue records in favour of the petitioners. Subsequently, it appears
