dated
16.01.2010 seeking permission from the RDO for setting aside
the mutation orders in favour of the petitioners is behind the
back of the petitioners ... without canceling the mutation orders, the order dated
07.04.2007, could not be implemented. Therefore, the Tahsildar
vide order dated 16.01.2010 has written
said ''Will'' executed on the basis of
mutation order passed by Naib Tahsildar. Thereafter, the
aforesaid private complaint has been filed ... Will'' in question
executed on the basis of mutation order passed by Naib
Tahsildar. Despite that, filing of private complaint itself
reflects
having been filed in the Court of concerned Tehsildar,
the exparte mutation order dated 29.07.2021 has been set-aside.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners ... from Mirzapur and
thereafter got their names mutated. When this fact came to his
knowledge, the mutation order in pursuance of his restoration
application
Tahsildar Gopadbanas is Annexure A-2. It is further submitted that mutation
order dated 27.07.2021 was challenged by the respondent No.2 before ... record.
The sole case of the applicants rest on the mutation order passed by the
Tahsildar and affirmed by the SDO in the appeal. Applicants
seal of the concerned
authority/Municipal Council, the petitioner fabricated the mutation
order in respect to the house owned by father of the
petitioner/accused ... accused by
preparing forged documents, seals of Municipal Council got the
mutation order in his favour. The record also reveals that the said
application allegedly
both the parties and opposite party no.2 neither challenged the order of mutation dated 10.04.2012 nor he ever challenged the Will dated 30.11.2000. Learned ... forged Will or they executed the forged Will, rather there is order of mutation dated 10.04.2012 (Annexure No.9 to the affidavit filed in support
order this day, the court passed
the following:
ORDER
This petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for
quashing the order ... basis of said complaint, Tehsildar vide
3
order dated 17.8.2017 cancelled the aforesaid order of mutation passed
in favour of Anwar and directed the Police
reported
the matter to the RDO seeking permission to implement
the mutation order dated 07.04.2007 in the revenue
records and therefore, there is no illegality ... writ
petition) nearly after twenty years of passing the
mutation orders in their favour in Proceedings
No.G/6262/2002 and G/6263/2002, dated
been preferred by the appellant Roshan Singh to set aside the impugned order dated 20.01.2022, whereby the Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Bijnor has rejected ... basis of forged and fabricated will her name mutated in Revenue Record. After then mutation order was set aside by the Revenue Authorities after hearing
been preferred by the appellant Sumit Kumar to set aside the impugned order dated 08.03.2022, whereby the Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Bijnor has rejected ... Devi mutated in Revenue Record by ex-parte order. After then mutation order was set aside by the Revenue Authorities after hearing the parties.
Learned
