respondents 1 to 5 herein under the release deed dated 22nd July, 1974. The consideration for the release is said ... 22nd July, 1974 executed by the insolvent is sham and nominal. The release deed is said to be voidable and liable to be set aside
release deed is perfectly valid. Since it is argued
by the learned counsel for the appellant that the gift deed is a sham and
nominal ... release deed, the releasee gets title to the property conveyed.
Hence, the plea that a sale deed or release deed is a sham and nominal
order dated 21-4-1970, considered the document to be a release deed, and determined the stamp duty payable at Rs. 22-50. On getting ... fact that the nominal title under the sale deed stood solely in his name. Upon these recitals, the deed of release declared that the releaser
same day, under Ext. Dl the nominal rights of the plaintiff over the makkathayam properties were released in favour of the mother. Both these documents ... nominal rights of the plaintiff over makka-thayam properties were released in favour of the mother taking into account the gift deed so that
order, dated 21st April, 1970, considered the document to be a release deed and determined the stamp duty payable at Rs. 22.50. On getting ... fact that the nominal title under the sale deed stood solely in his name. Upon these recitals the deed of release declared that the releasor
item, the trial Court held that the release deed executed _ by Chockalinga was a sham and nominal document and that therefore the legal representatives ... lower Court that Exhibit A-10 release deed executed by Chockalinga was a sham and nominal document and was not given effect to, is correct
elder brother had executed a release deed in her favour in respect of the land, that thereafter the 1st defendant was herself getting the land ... cultivated the land and pleaded that the release deed of 10-3-1909 was a fraudulent and nominal transaction. The defendant had never been
Sri Vishwaraj vs B M Byrappa on 1 March, 2013
Author: Aravind Kumar
Bench: Aravind
same application, they also prayed for a declaration that the release deed dated July 27, 1945, executed by the said Swaminatha Iyer in favour ... Iyer. It is averred, with reference to this release deed, that it was a sham and nominal transaction, not acted upon, and brought about
Mariam Bibee vs Shaikh Muhammad Ibrahim And Ors. on 14 June, 1916
Equivalent citations: 48IND
