help in getting the sale deed effected and asked the respondent to execute a release deed nominally in his favour and subsequently tried to sell ... Release Deed dated 25.8.73 and his case relating to the circumstances under which he executed the release deed is to be found in paras
sale deed dated
16.11.2013. Thereafter, the defendant has approached the
plaintiff for releasing of his share and the said release deed
is a nominal document ... confirmation deed which are executed
subsequent to the release deed, the Trial Court comes to
the conclusion that if there was a release deed executed
sale deed dated
16.11.2013. Thereafter, the defendant has approached the
plaintiff for releasing of his share and the said release deed
is a nominal document ... confirmation deed which are executed
subsequent to the release deed, the Trial Court comes to
the conclusion that if there was a release deed executed
elder brother had executed a release deed in her favour in respect of the land, that thereafter the 1st defendant was herself getting the land ... cultivated the land and pleaded that the release deed of 10-3-1909 was a fraudulent and nominal transaction. The defendant had never been
Sri Vishwaraj vs B M Byrappa on 1 March, 2013
Author: Aravind Kumar
Bench: Aravind
shows that it is not even pleaded that
the release Deed was executed subject to a condition that
the transferees (daughters of respondent ... being the nominal
owner or real owner of the landed property in question,
Respondent No.2 has Executed Registered Release Deed
bearing No.3928/2010
shows that it is not even pleaded that
the release Deed was executed subject to a condition that
the transferees (daughters of respondent ... being the nominal
owner or real owner of the landed property in question,
Respondent No.2 has Executed Registered Release Deed
bearing No.3928/2010
urged that
the alleged release deed was executed when he was a minor and
hence, the release deed was void ab initio and not binding ... release deed has been
proved.
25. Although the counsel for respondents 1(a) and 1(b) has
contended that this release deed was a nominal
Prithvipati agreed to release his share of the
property for a nominal consideration in favour of the plaintiffs.
Accordingly, release/relinquishment deed dated
partition, has not been
substantiated by acceptable evidence and therefore the
partition deed cannot be said to have been acted upon.
28. Even assuming ... acted upon. A significant
circumstance in this regard is the registered release deed
dated 23.11.1991, marked as Ex.P-2, under which a
portion
